An Alternative Approach to Contact-Based CubeSat-Pod Structural Interface
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65834/jdsi.11.35Keywords:
contact theory, finite element method, modal analysis, boundary condition, CubeSatAbstract
This study presents the dynamic behavior of a 3U CubeSat structure under launch conditions, proposing an alternative boundary condition to bring test and finite element analysis (FEA) results closer together. The assumptions of bottom fixation, bottom-top fixation and rail fixation seen in the literature can represent the real system as being either too soft or too rigid, potentially making designs either overly conservative or overly optimistic. With this motivation, the CubeSat–pod interface was modeled with 6-degree-of-freedom spring (CBUSH) stiffnesses derived from Hertz–Mindlin–Popov contact theories. The proposed approach was verified with a part-to-whole strategy: (i) Printed Circuit Board (PCB)-standoff set (test 360 Hz, analysis 365 Hz; 1.4% difference), (ii) PCB-standoff-dummy mass set (test 246 Hz, analysis 250 Hz; 1.6% difference), and (iii) whole CubeSat was applied test and analysis for different boundary conditions. For proposed boundary condition, the analysis results were 96/126 Hz along the lateral axes, the test results were 96.7/120 Hz; along the longitudinal axis, test and analysis results were 137.9 Hz and 138 Hz, respectively. The test-analysis difference was minimum 14.7% with common boundary conditions in the literature, whereas a maximum deviation of 4.7% was observed with the proposed contact-based boundary condition, which yields an enhancement of better than 10% in natural frequency predictions. The results indicate that the analyses performed using the proposed boundary condition show a high level of agreement with the actual test data. Based on this finding, the proposed approach can lead to low-cost and time-effective satellite testing and design processes.
References
Ampatzoglou, A., & Kostopoulos, V. (2018). Design, analysis, optimization, manufacturing, and testing of a 2U CubeSat. International Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2018, Article 9724263. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9724263
Araújo, L. (2024). Dynamic Response of a CubeSat within a Deployer during Launch Phase. MSc Thesis, IST Lisbon.
Areda, E. E., Cordova-Alarcon, J. R., Masui, H., & Cho, M. (2022). Development of Innovative CubeSat Platform for Mass Production. Applied Sciences, 12(18), 9087. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12189087
Bomani, B. M. M., et al. (2021). CubeSat Technology Past and Present: Current State-of-the-Art. NASA TP-20210000201.
Bostan, V., Guţu, M., Melnic, V., & Martîniuc, A. (2024). Structural analysis and vibration testing of the tumnanosat microsatellite. Journal of Engineering Sciences, (4), 8-21. https://doi.org/10.52326/jes.utm.2024.31(4).01
Elshaal, A., Okasha, M., Sulaeman, E., Jallad, A. H., Aizat, W. F. A., & Alzubaidi, A. B. (2024). Structural analysis of AlAinSat-1 CubeSat. Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Sciences, 27(3), 532–546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrs.2024.06.006
García-López, A., Sánchez, J., & Arévalo, L. (2019). Structural design and analysis of a 3U standardized CubeSat for a future Mexican mission. In Proceedings of the XXXII Congreso de Instrumentación de la Sociedad Mexicana de Instrumentación (SOMI), Acapulco, México.
Herrera-Arroyave, J. E., Bermúdez-Reyes, B., Ferrer-Pérez, J. A., & Colín, A. (2016, September 26–30). CubeSat system structural design. In Proceedings of the 67th International Astronautical Congress (IAC) (pp. 1–5). Guadalajara, Mexico.
Kaya, A. (2019). Kompozit 3U küp uyduların yapısal analizi ve tasarımları (Yüksek lisans tezi, İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi).
Kanavouras, K., Hein, A.M., & Sachidanand, M. (2022). Agile Systems Engineering for sub-CubeSat scale spacecraft. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2210.10653
Kempf, J., Mühlbauer, T., & Dasbach, H. (2021). Space Factory 4.0 – Industry 4.0 approaches for automated small-satellite production. In Proceedings of the 72nd International Astronautical Congress (IAC 2021). International Astronautical Federation.
Popov, V. L. (2010). Contact mechanics and friction: Physical principles and applications. Springer.
Thimmaraju Girijadevi, L. (2023). Vibration analysis and testing of a 6U CubeSat propulsion system. MSc Thesis, KTH. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A1817018&dswid=-6733
Torres, A. E. i. (2024). Manufacturing Process of a CubeSat Structure. Master’s thesis, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya.
Wan Aasim, W. F. A., AlMazrouei, M., Okasha, M., & Jallad, A. H. (2022). The structural analysis of AlainSat-1: An earth observation 3U CubeSat. In 4th Symposium on Space Educational Activities. Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Defence and Security Industries: Strategy and Technology

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.